The Pilgrimage is Completed
The four Society pilgrims returned safely to their various places of residence on Wednesday night. As they collectively took over 500 pictures, it will be an enormous task to compile these and to present our many observations. Iosephus and I briefly discussed a strategy for doing so, but, for now, let me offer you just a few photos of mine and a few very short reflections on some of the more profane aspects of the pilgrimage. In the future we will make all of the best photos available in a single post.1) We were all able to finish the pilgrimage. I had been somewhat amused by the dark and foreboding tales of blisters and sore feet. To some extent, I still that think these warnings are a mite overblown. If you are a person in reasonably good health, even an American of ample proportions (as some of us are), and you bring good shoes, and are prepared to grit your teeth and do penance, then you should be fine. This is not to say that your feet will not hurt, even more than they may ever have hurt before, or that Our Lord might allow you to debase your pride by being treated by the kind medics of the Order of Malta. But while this walk may punish your skin and your pride, it does not maim, exactly. The type of physical endurance required is the province of the common man, not that reserved to any athlete. There were pilgrims both male and female, from only ten years to the very grips of old age. Providence may present you with torments which prevent you from singing gleefully every step of the way, or even enjoying the astoundingly beautiful French countryside, but this is the very nature of the Christian life.
The elements that make this pilgrimage particularly trying are not entirely common to other sports. I have long enjoyed backpacking, and Iosephus is a practiced cross country runner, but I couldn't say that my experience exactly prepared me. In backpacking, you can stop for a rest whenever you feel the need. On the road to Chartres, it is difficult to stop even to steady a water bottle for a drink: the column must march on with or without you. Another important thing to know beforehand is that about half of the pilgrimage takes place on asphalt, which is much less forgiving than the Camembert-soft grassy French countryside which I had envisioned. As for the mileage and pace, the first two days well exceed 20 miles, but are moderately paced, with nearly all available daylight used for walking. In the familiar terms of the computer generation, the pace is strenuous, and much of the bacon and flour you bought in St. Louis has run out, but Billy probably won't die of typhoid.
2) The French. What can the French do well? They know how to cook, for sure, and we had plenty of time to experience this in Paris, but the walk to Chartres isn't exactly the right place for fine cuisine. They do know organization, though. In the end, this was probably what impressed me the most about the French. Of course, they have been doing this pilgrimage for 24 years, but the precision of their planning and coordination was the nonetheless astounding. There was never a shortage of food (that which was provided), of water, or of traffic conductors. They transported unlimited amounts of baggage for thousands of pilgrims, and laid it out on the ground in such a way as to make it immediately accessible when arriving into camp for the night. The large camps were well layed out, with ample supplies of portable toilets, tents for pilgrims without their own, and plenty of room for those so provided. Every several miles or so, there was a medical station, with extra bottles of water. French motorcyclists drove up and down the miles long procession, ensuring the safety of the pilgrims. Although we had spotless weather, and many likely catastrophes did not arise, the entire organization seemed perfect to me. I cannot give high enough praise to Notre-Dame de Chrétienté for their work in conducting the pilgrimage.
3) The British. The four pilgrims from the Cornell Society for a Good Time walked with the English, specifically with their "Juventutem" Chapter composed primarily of youth. Despite being people who cannot utter the word "youth", or even worse, "pastorally appropriate youth ministry" without our humours being seriously disturbed, we thoroughly enjoyed ourselves with this excellent bunch of young persons. I might even be so droll as to call them our future... Anyways, the British, as well as a few Australians, and other Americans, put up with us Yanks and our terrible pronunciation of their language, and were always very, very kind to us. They let us carry the Union Jack and sing Rule Britannia with gusto, while they assured us that Dixie would be in next year's British songbook. I think one particular incident gives a good impression of the company in which we walked. Just before arriving at the second camp, while my feet were feeling as if I were walking on hot sand and I could think only of dousing them, a young English scout in our Chapter burst into song with that energy seen only in the very young, rousing us all into higher spirits. A round consisting of "Jubilate Deo, Jubilate Deo, Alleluia" was sung. An Australian Father who walked with us, and who had been hearing Confessions all day, upon sighting the camp, noted with humor and the characteristic drawl of his homeland, that There was a God. The young scout, though breathless and between songs, replied with all the trappings of the canonical English lad: "Well you of all people should know, Father."
We all had a very Good Time.
go to main page
St. Louis-Marie de Montfort, ora pro nobis
St. Joseph, ora pro nobis
St. Ambrose of Milan, ora pro nobis
St. Dominic, ora pro nobis
St. Francis (and St. Clare), orate pro nobis
St. Catherine of Siena, ora pro nobis
St. Alphonsus Ligouri, ora pro nobis
St. John Chrysostom, ora pro nobis

8 Comments:
Pax Christi. Evidence of the typical disconnect between the Traditional Mass and personal lifestyle: It appears girls wore pants and shorts. It is bad enough when men feel the need to wear shorts on traditional pilgrimages, as did Michael Davies.
And let's give the nationalism (flag waving) a rest. I, a former USMC infantry officer, would not now march under the Stars n' Stripes, a country where a man must be "Christian" to be elected to political office but is barred if he is an authentic Catholic. And I find the Union Jack a symbol of antiCatholicism. Indeed, the US and GB military-political alliance are the best representives of the antichrist in these dark days.
Traditionalist laymen need to focus less on the rubrics of the Mass and more on the specifics of their own lifestyle, culture, and society.
guadeloupe guard shuld have been there rather than criticising from the sidelines.
Whilst I personally wore long trousers throughout, I will not cast stones at those who wore shorts. Nor do I think it reasonable (still less charitable) to demand 19th Century American dress codes of my (British) children in blistering heat. They got a huge amount from the pilgrimage and any 10 year old who can walk 30 miles in a day for the love of Our Lady (as my lad did) is welcome to wear shorts to do so as far as I'm concerned.
As for the rest of our life style, I find it presumptuous of gg to make any assumptions at all. It seems gg is looking only to find fault, not to see the undoubted merit in the real sacrifices made by so many on this pilgrimage.
You can be comforted that the Society for a Good Time was an all pants, all-the-time operation. You could cheer for us at least from the sidelines... In fact, this seemed to be the case with most of the Americans and some of the Brits. While I was not distracted by such dress related things, (nor do I really think it worth complaining about, in the circumstances of the pilgrimage) it is an important observation: and only one of the obvious differences between the more "conservative" American pilgrims and everybody else.
However, dear Sir, I must take issue with your attack on our supposed nationalism. Excuse me for an outburst, and I don't intend it directly at yourself, but I am absolutely sick of people inventing reasons not to be patriotic Americans. Sure, I'd love to be living in an American Catholic monarchy, and many, many things about this country disgust me, but I don't exactly have the right to declare, willy-nilly, that the flag of my American ancestors deserves no respect. This is false traditionalism! Look into the history of the Catholic Church in America, where there is very little precedent for such sentiments. It is entirely a modern notion, that we have the right, as mere laymen, to refuse our obedience and patriotic duty (at least in just matters) purely because we are not happy with the leadership or nature of our country. If you won't march under the flag for GB, or for the current Senate, or for Washington, or that devil Jefferson, do it at the very least for the thousands of faithful Catholics who gave their lives for our country, and the many who still do. The Vatican is populated by many distasteful folks but surely you woudn't disdain her flag as merely the symbol of the New Rome! We wave the flag of the Eternal Rome, the Rome of our Pope! Likewise, but to an obviously lesser extent, do we raise high the Union Jack and the Stars and Stripes.
Love of country is a Christian virtue. That doesn't mean we support everything the country does or stands for. Traditional Catholicism never required some sort of trans-national obsession and an accompanying aversion to national pride and patrimony that you seem to suggest.
Even a Catholic in a pagan nation like Nepal can love his country.
God placed you in the country of your birth. It wasn't your choice. You therefore don't, as a good Christian, have the choice of rendering your allegiance to your sovereign whether or not you it pleases you. It's your Christian duty to love and support your country. Within the bounds Catholic faith, rendering to Caesar what is Caesar’s.
Isn't it curious that Dante places the lowest level of Hell not for heretics, or sodomites, or apostates, but for traitors to their nations?
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all, born and unborn.
(The last three words are added-in by the current, active duty Catholic officers with whom I serve with pride and honor every time we recite the pledge after praying a Hail Mary and Our Father first.)
RE Pants on pilgrimage: The kilt is the trad Scottish attire celebrated in the fight for a Catholic Scotland. Are the bare legs of the Scot offensive on pilgrimage??
Not offensive as long as his kilt is of such a cut as to fall below the knees. : )
Perhaps guadalupe guard should have commented at another time, but he does make some good points. Will women lose their soul if they wear pants or shorts? I hope not, but they might if they are short and tight as immodesty offends our Lord. The same applies to men who wear short, tight shorts. Will they spend extra time in purgatory? Probably, depends. I do know that St. Padre Pio who died just 40 some years ago would not let any women in his confessional unless they wore dresses 8 inches below the knee and he would not let in anyone with pants, let alone shorts. St. Pio was one of our centuries greatest saints and when asked why he would not hear their confession, he said Our Lord would not let him. He also called these women clowns. See http://olrl.org/misc/food.shtml. I trust in St. Pio and his advice is never out of date. The poster on his church read:
"The Church is the House of God. It is forbidden for men to enter with bare arms or in shorts. It is forbidden for women to enter in trousers, without a veil on their head, in short clothing, low necklines, sleeveless or immodest dresses."
Has a seer ever seen Our Blessed Mother in pants or shorts? God forbid. How did men and women religious dress before Vatican II - dressed from head to toe like Our Lady and St. Joseph. As for the Scots, their kilts are ceremonial and Scots are a tiny fraction of the world's population. Many traditionalists only wear dresses on Sunday, a bad example for their children.
As for patriotism, I would defend this country if enemies were coming over the border and I would never be a traitor, but I wouldn't want to volunteer for a war for oil and for the Zionists in Iraq. Clearly an unjust war. Not that I like Moslems either. It seems they are getting chastised pretty badly as we will in this country one day for its abortions, birth control, pornography, etc. As for the flag, it has 50 five pointed masonic stars on it. Something one should think about. As for the pledge of allegiance - one nation under God - but which God? Our one true Catholic God or the masonic god? The same on our coins. In which God are we supposed to be trusting? Render to Caesar, true, but to God first. I was born here, but I don't have to stay here. One can retire or move to a Catholic country (not too many left, true) like Portugal or Malta. Christopher Ferrara has a good article about neo-Catholicism and Americanism in the latest Remnant. One should read it.
Post a Comment
<< Home